Mostrando postagens com marcador Debt Collection in Brazil. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Debt Collection in Brazil. Mostrar todas as postagens

segunda-feira, 29 de maio de 2017

Guarantees and securities in Brazilian Law


Brazilian Law provides for wide array of guarantees and securities. Herein below, you will find a brief explanation of the main varieties.

1.         Endorsement (aval)

The endorsement is a personal guarantee of the payment of an instrument of credit. Under the endorsement, the guarantor promises to pay the debt in the event the borrower fails to do so. The creditor becomes invested in the power of collecting the debt from the guarantor or the borrower as soon as the instrument of credit becomes due.

The endorsement is a type of guarantee mainly used in instruments of credit (on the back of note, for example; or a personal endorsement made by the director of a firm). 

It is a very commong guarantee. 

2.         Surety (fiança)

It is a written obligation. It is a contract whereby the surety guarantees the fulfillment of the obligation of the debtor in the event the latter fails to do so. It also guarantees the payment of compensation or penalty for non-fulfillment of an obligation undertaken by the debtor.

The surety may be granted by individuals or legal entities, including banks, whereby the debtor hires a financial institution to act as guarantor of an obligation.

It is very common in rental agreements and in some kinds of loans.

3.         Bill of Exchange (letra de câmbio)

It is a Marketable title. It consists of a payment order by means of which an individual demands that another individual pays a certain amount to a third party. It comprises details such as payment, date and place to perform it.

This is the same Bill of Exchange used in the US and in Europe. However, in Brazil its use is very limited. Only markets where the players are used to it actually use it. Most people will prefer a Promissory Note (see below).

4.         Promissory Note (nota promissória)

An instrument of credit represented by an unconditional promise in writing between two parties, signed by one who agrees to pay on a certain date a certain sum of money to the other or the bearer of the promissory note.

The promissory note is more widely used in Brazil, in comparison with the Bill of Exchange.

5.         Commercial Pledge (penhor mercantil)

Commercial pledge is to have a commercial good ensuring the fulfillment of an obligation. It becomes valid with the transference of possession of the property of the good by the debtor to the creditor.

The pledge shall be in written form and is usually registered before the Registry of Deeds and Documents. 

This is not too common.


6.         Security deposit of instruments of credit (caução de títulos de crédito)

Derived from the commercial pledge, the security deposit of instruments of credit is a guarantee established over credits held by the guarantor.

In the security deposit, the object of the guarantee is the right of the guarantor represented by a negotiable instrument. Therefore, the need to guarantee demands the delivery of the instrument to the creditor, by means of an agreement executed between the parties.

Through the security deposit agreement, the creditor becomes able to exercise all the rights to the instrument of credit, but always on behalf of the debtor, ie, there is no transfer of the property of the instrument of credit.

This is a common kind of guarantee, since it is easy to manage.

7.         Trust receipt (alienação fiduciária)

The trust receipt operates by means of the transfer of ownership of a certain good to the creditor in order to secure the fulfillment of an obligation of the debtor, who maintains the direct ownership of the good, as depositary.

In this type of guarantee, if the debtor fails to settle the obligation at the due date, then the creditor may require action of search and seizure of the sold good, and after taking possession of such good, it may sell it to a third party and settle the outstanding debt.

This is more commonly used by banks, in lease and financing agreements.

8.         Antichresis (anticrese)

The antichresis grants the creditor the right of receiving the real property from the debtor and also the right to earn profits from such real property for the term the contract is in force.

This is rarely used.

9.         Mortgage (hipoteca)

A debt instrument, secured by the collateral of specified real estate property, that the borrower is obliged to pay back with a predetermined set of payments. Under Brazilian Law, mortgages must be registered before the Real State Registry. In the event the debtor fails to provide payment in the due date, the rights of ownership and possession over the real property are transferred to the creditor.

This is fairly used, especially in the financing of real estate.


domingo, 2 de março de 2014

Debt collection in Brazil x Korea


See also:  Verifying a Brazilian Power of Attorney - Question from Korea





I have just read a post from the Korea Law Blog that details how Korean courts can seize, or garnish, part of the salary of a debtor, in order to pay a creditor (Please check the link at the end).



The Korean system is remarkable. In Brazil, salaries cannot be seized for the payment of debts!


This limitation is traditional in our legal system, and is based on the old assumption that rich people would have colateral to guarantee his debts, while poor people would use 100% of its income to survive, and thus should not be subject to losing its only source nutrition and shelter.



This limitation is being lifted slowly by the courts, specially if the creditor is a former employee of the debtor and, therefore, would also need to receive its salary in order to survive.



Brazil is not Korea, though. You should always ask for a colaterall.



-------------------------------



The Korean Law Blog: Garnishing Wages in Korea: Collection of Debts in ...: I received a call from a friend asking about information concerning collecting on a large personal debt. He loaned money to a “friend” and ...

quarta-feira, 15 de maio de 2013

Quick Data on Bankruptcy and Tax Free areas



(Feel free to send me more questions, I will try to answer them the best way I can)



Q: Are you aware if Brazil has any "bonded tax-free areas" like Shanghai Waigaoqiao? thanks


Comment: Brazil has a few "Zonas francas", which have considerably lower taxation, such as the Zona Franca de Manaus, in the Amazon Forest. 

In addition to that, Brazil has some tax benefit zones, such as a big one in the Northeasth, where taxation is generally lower. 

Finally, Brazil also has some other tax benefits for parts and raw materials that are imported, industrialized here and then reexported.



Q: Can you provide an overview of the bankruptcy process in Brazil? If so, please briefly elaborate on how your background enables you to discuss this topic.

Comment: Yes. The bankruptcy process in Brazil is relatively fair, by which I mean it is more favorable to the debtors, but not absolutely.

However, government credits, employee’s credits and credits secured by mortgages have clear preferences over commercial debts. 

Thus, big companies seldom pay more than 20% of its outstanding debts to ordinary creditors after the liquidation procedure.  


See also:


sábado, 2 de fevereiro de 2013

Provisional seizure of assets in Brazil - Arbitration or litigation?


How can a foreign company seize assets belonging to a Brazilian debtor? The exchange of messages below may give you some hints. 

__________________

Dear 雄鹰, 

(Note: 雄鹰 [Xióng yīng] is my Chinese name, given to me by my teacher)

I am writing to send my appreciation to your valuable articles about in the Brazilian Law Blog.

Here is a quick question to see if you may offer an opinion. Recently my company ("Fist of the Dragon co.”) is considering to sign a Settlement Agreement to resolve a debt dispute with our customer in Brazil.

Since we still concern that the customer will breach the Settlement Agreement not to pay back the money, we are willing to apply to provisional seizure (that is, we ask the court to freeze the customer’s asset to secure our loan) in the beginning of the legal proceeding.

Base on the provisional seizure strategy, I may need your opinion to tell if a jurisdiction clause in the Settlement Agreement to have arbitration in the arbitration institute or litigation in the court can satisfy said strategy? 

It is highly appreciated if you may offer valuable opinion, and I am looking forward to your reply.

Regards,

Bruce Lee

-------------


Dear  Mr. Lee, 

Thank you very much for your message. It is a great pleasure to know my writings are having a positive impact. 

Unfortunately, I do not see your strategy with good eyes.

The provisional seizure of money does not work that way in Brazil. Before any provisional seizure can be granted by the court, you must first show an executive title (such as a promissory note or check). Then the other party will have time to respond, and only after that the judge might grant seizure. 

If possible, I would ask for a bank guarantee for the settlement. 

It a bank guarantee is not possible, then I believe you should adopt a choice of jurisdiction clause, not an arbitration clause. The jurisdiction should be the city where the Brazilian Company has its main place of business.  (I’m going against my usual advice here, for I usually suggest arbitration. But your case is special)

Please note that, since I haven't had access to the case, this email cannot be considered as a legal opinion. 

I would be glad to help you in this matter. Please tell me how can I help you with this agreement. 

Also, may I post this message in my blog, without mentioning your name?


Warm regards, 

 雄鹰, 
--------------

Dear Adler,

Thanks a lot for your prompt reply with valuable opinion. Your efficiency gives me good impression. And yes, you may post my question to your blog without mentioned my name and the company's nationality. 

(…)

Once again, I appreciate for your opinion.



Regards,

Bruce Lee

terça-feira, 20 de novembro de 2012

Debt Collection in Brazil - Non Receipt of Overdue Payments



Note: This is a reply I've sent to a client many years ago.  The client sold DVD players to Brazil, but did not receive payment. 

The client neither elected arbitration in his agreement with the Brazilian party, nor asked for a negotiable instrument as an additional collateral for the payment.   Mortal errors to his claims.  

Dear Mr. Goodwill

 After going through your case, I'm happy to present you some considerations.

Please allow me to make a brief introduction to the relevant aspects of your case:

Had you a negotiable instrument signed by the importer, such as a promissory note, it would allow us to file a debt collection lawsuit (execução). This would take less time,  2-3 years maybe. But, unfortunately, this is not the case. 

In your case, we must file a lawsuit in order to obtain a judicial declaration of the debt, and only later move on to the phase of debt collection.

 Such court procedures in Brazil can, unfortunately, take long years to be completely settled. In the Sao Paulo State, above all, court procedures usually take at least 3 years, even the relatively simple ones. Usually, they will take no less than 5 years.

 Thus, I believe that the amicable composition is the best option right now. This can be achieved through negotiation, with the aid of some pressure mechanism made available by Law, such as the public registration of the company's debt before public notaries (Protesto).

 It should also be noted that many Brazilian companies have defaulted their import payments due to the Real (the Brazilian currency) devaluation before the dollar.  

 After all, the dollar appreciation causes the merchandise to become more expensive and makes the taxes due over the imports automatically become higher.

 This has lead many buyers to simply leave the goods at the port, unclaimed. 

 If this is the situation, the debt collection may be simpler, for we may obtain a warrant to seize the goods at the port.

 On the other hand, if the default has been made on purpose or due to financial difficulties, then the Judicial Claim of the debt may be the next necessary step.

 After the initial contact with the debtor, we will have a more clear definition of which situation they are in.  Even if we choose the amicable way as a starting point, your right to claim the debt before the courts remains unaltered.

 In case you have any other doubt, please contact me through e-mail or phone. 

Adler