quarta-feira, 17 de agosto de 2016

Crowdfunding in Brazil - Past and future

I have been following the development of Crowdfunding regulation in Brazil in recent years.

My view about it has been mostly pessimistic, as you can see at  Crowdfunding in Brazil - Someone thinks it is possible and also in the article below, which has been originally published at Alternative Emerging Investor magazine.

However, Brazilian Secuirities & Exchange Comission (CVM) has finally called for a public round of debates, in order to discuss a draft regulation for equity crowdfunding in Brazil.

The call for contributions stresses the importance or equity crowdfunding for the development of tech companies and also highlights its use as an alternative source of financing, that is welcome at a moment when Brazilian basic interest rate is at 14,15% per year.

The regulation is a bit harsh, in my opinion.

On the bright side, it has dismissed the need for previous registration of each crowdfunding opportunity with CVM. However, it will demand previous registration of the investment platforms with CVM (as if the websites and platforms were financial companies or small banks).

Other than this initial setback, the regulation seems pro-business. It will apply to crowdfunding rules similar to the simplified rules applicable to public offers by small companies.

The main points of the proposal are:

a) the company receiving the investment must be a limited liability company (Ltda);
b) the maximum gross revenue of the company will be 10 million reais (~3 million USD);
c) maximum value to be obtained through a crowdfunding campaing is 5 million reais (~1,5 million USD);
d) each individual can invest a maximum of 10 thousand reais (or 3 thousand USD)  per year, but exceptions are made to qualified investors;
e) a full business plan, including details such as the fee that is being paid to the investment platform;
f) there are provisions allowing for syndicated investment by professional groups.

I will follow this topic and post further developments here.

Meanwhile, if you can read Portuguese, please check the proposed regulation here.

For an overview of what the market is at the moment (that is, before the new rules come to force), please read the article below.


Crowd funding still not a replacement for private equity in Brazil
 By Adler Martins - Originally published at Alternative Emerging Investor magazine. 

Brazil has a modest crowd funding scene, with less than a dozen famous websites in the area. The amounts those websites are capable to process is estimated in less than a couple million dollars per year.

Like anywhere else in the world, Brazilian crowd funding operations are focused in a few basic areas: artistic events, including movies; innovative business ventures (often related to technology and internet) and nonprofit initiatives, usually humanitarian in nature.

In a sense, a crowd funding website works as a mini stock exchange: entrepreneurs will present their projects, and the website will act as a broker between the new venture and many possible investors or supporters.

The operation is not identical to an IPO, however. It is common for companies looking for crowd funding to offer benefits that are not related to equity or profits. For example: absolutely nothing (in case of humanitarian initiatives); the chance to obtain a small part in a future movie; one or two units of the product that the company plans to develop.

Problem is: according to Brazilian law, the similarity with a regular public offer is too stark to disregard, which may trigger the application of several rules governing capital and financial markets.

This article will make a brief overview of the risks crowd funding websites face in Brazil, especially those dealing on the funding of new business ventures (as opposed to cultural and humanitarian projects).

Background: Brazil is scarred when it comes to public saving and capital markets

Brazil has suffered heavily from lack of capital pools, extremely high inflation and currency devaluation during the nineteen hundreds.

A series of misfortunes has left a mark on Brazilian capital market rules and regulations, many of them drafted during the dictatorship era, notably 1960-1970.

In spite of moderate advancements in the last 20 years, Brazilian financial system is clearly out of sync with recent developments such as crowd funding.

Public offers and the Brazilian Stock Exchange Commission (CVM)

Brazilian law n. 6.385, from 1976, regulates the stock markets. It defines public offers in a rather broad way, describing all usual financial instruments (bonds, equity, and preferential shares) and including a general description of “any other bonds, or collective investment arrangements, when offered to the public”.

It is widely recognized that any public offer that is related to any kind of return on invested capital is potentially regulated by Law. N. 6.385.

The same rules also describes that the Brazilian securities market shall be operated by a limited number of participants. Among them stock exchanges (such as Bovespa) and financial institutions, including banks and stock brokers. 

Basically, all financial institutions are regulated by Law n. 4.595 from 1964 (as well as by many other legal rules), which requires them to obtain previous approval by the Brazilian Central Bank, before starting operations.

In consequence, there is no way an independent entity, such as a small website, would be able to publicly trade or offer securities without being previously registered with the Brazilian Central Bank.

Finally, normative instruction n. 400, from 2003, issued by the Brazilian Comissão de Valores Mobiliários - CVM (our Stock Exchange Commission) demands that any public offer be previously registered with CVM.

Therefore, it is clear that only a financial institution, formally approved by the Brazilian Central Bank, may request CVM’s approval in order to, finally, be able to make public offers.

The protection of public savings by the prohibition of raffles similar practices

The route described above may seem a little disheartening.

However, let’s not forget that one of the crow funding modalities does not deal specifically with equity in the new ventures, but with the purchase of products that will be developed in the future.

Unfortunately, this path also does not offer any shelter to crowd funding websites. Brazilian law n. 5.768, from 1971, regulates the public placement of raffles or similar gambling competitions that are offered to the public.

The law says that any raffle or similar scheme that is publicly offered and that involves previous collection of payment by a large pool of consumers must be previously approved by the government.

Penal sanctions

The practice of business or operations that are restricted to financial institutions is a crime in Brazil, as per law n. 7.492 from 1986.

Also, the company’s directors may be held responsible for such behaviors.

Options for crowd funding web sites.

Since it seems that usual crowd funding web sites are not allowed to operate in Brazil, at least not in the traditional way, one must inquiry if there are any legal options for such ventures in Brazil.

One option that comes to mind is to establish them as not for profit organizations that organize raffles. This is because law n. 5.768 does not prohibit the organization of raffles and similar competitions by churches, humanitarian organizations and other institutions that serve the public. Such institutions must obtain a previous declaration of public utility before being able to enjoy this benefit.

A second option would be to organized crowd funding websites merely as intermediaries of donations made from the public to a specific business venture. This arrangement is not ideal, though, because it would eliminate the possibility of equity ownership in the company. The donors would, at maximum, be entitled to a small gift from the company, in exchange for their donation.

A third option is for Brazilian crowd funding sites to be located abroad, in countries where the regulation of such small scale investments is less restricted. After the funds are acquired, the total amount could be invested in Brazil as foreign direct investment. This option, as all others, is also not perfect. The remittance of money abroad is difficult for the average Brazilian citizen, for example. Also, this kind of operation would allow only the ownership of equity in the future company, not the purchase of future products.


We hope Brazilian regulation evolves to catch up with modern ways of funding new ventures. Before that, crowd funding in Brazil remains a gray area, with a lot of risks associated to it. 
--------------------------------------------------
NOTE: This article was published before August 2016, when Brazilian Stock & Exchange commission started regulation of equity crowdfunding. Please see the beggining of the post for updated information.


quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016

Census of Foreign Capital in the Country 2016


The Central Bank of Brazil started the five-year Census of Foreign Capital. Until August 15, 2016, legal entities that meet the parameters set by the authority must provide a statement on the participation of foreign capital in its organization.

The legal entities that have direct participation of non-residents in its capital; investment funds with non-resident shareholders; and legal entities that have received financial support from non-residents in an amount equal to or greater than US $ 1,000,000.00 (one million American dollars), are required to provide the declaration.

If the legal entity fails to provide the statement within the statutory period, or provides false, incomplete or incorrect information, then it will be subject to a fine of up to R$ 250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand Brazilian reais).


terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2016

Contribution to Tax Notes website - Foreign Companies See Increase in US Class Action Suits Over Taxes

Tax Notes LogoI have been asked to provide some details about Brazilian law to an article published by TaxNotes.com,  a non-profit that provides excellent coverage of tax matters.

The article, very well drafted by Mr. William Hoke, describes the recent uptick in tax-related class action suits filed in the U.S. by shareholders of foreign firms.

He mentions me in a paragraph describing how Brazilian law treats class action lawsuit filed by shareholders of a company.

Please check it (it is after a pay wall)

Foreign Companies See Increase in US Class Action Suits Over Taxes 

quarta-feira, 11 de maio de 2016

The New Challenges of Fighting Corruption in Brazil: Changes in Brazilian Legal and Political Culture and the Defense of Rule of Law, Democracy and Freedom


05_16_12_LCBS_The New Challenges of Fighting Corruption in Brazil FOR WEB

Professor Bruno Wanderley is one of my mentors, since college. 


I urge all of you to go see his lecture. 





The New Challenges of Fighting Corruption in Brazil: Changes in Brazilian Legal and Political Culture and the Defense of Rule of Law, Democracy and Freedom

May 16 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

05_16_12_LCBS_The New Challenges of Fighting Corruption in Brazil FOR WEB
Please join the Lemann Center for Brazilian Studies for a lecture entitled “The New Challenges of Fighting Corruption in Brazil: Changes in Brazilian Legal and Political Culture and the Defense of Rule of Law, Democracy and Freedom,” by Bruno Wanderley Junior.
The lecture will present the endemic corruption in Brazil through a historical analysis, from the colonial period to present day. It will focus on the cultural change in the political relationship between the people and the State in the combat against all forms of corruption and in the defense of democracy and freedom as essential conditions for the consolidation of the rule of law in Brazil. Finally, the lecture will discuss the role of the internal controlling agencies of public administration and the effectiveness of the legal system and constitutional law.
Bruno Wanderley Junior is the Director of the Laboratory of Law and Technological Innovation at UFMG (Federal University of Minas Gerais). He is also an Associate Professor of International and Constitutional Law at UFMG, a Professor of International Law and Human Rights at PUC Minas (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais), a Professor of Constitutional Law at UNIFENAS (University of Alfenas), and a Visiting Professor at FGV (Fundação Getúlio Vargas) in Rio de Janeiro. Bruno holds a PhD from UFMG, where he also obtained his masters and undergraduate degree.  He is an attorney at Law, registered at OAB (Brazilian Bar Association).

Details

Date:
May 16
Time:
1:00 pm - 2:00 pm
Event Categories:
Event Tags: